My Struggle with Productivity Systems—and the One That Finally Worked

"Nothing is less productive than to make more efficient what should not be done at all." — Peter Drucker

For most of my adult life, I’ve hunted for the perfect productivity system with the kind of fervor usually reserved for spiritual quests or fad diets. I have downloaded every app that promised a clean interface and a promise of order. I’ve read Getting Things Done not once, but three times, in the hope that something would click on the third pass. I’ve built and abandoned a dozen Notion dashboards, flirted with bullet journaling, and even tried time-blocking my weekends.

It never stuck.

The problem wasn’t laziness—at least, not in the way people usually mean it. It was more existential. Productivity systems, I began to feel, weren’t designed for people like me: people who resist structure even while craving it, who love lists but ignore them, who overthink tasks until they grow monstrous.

And yet, I’ve finally found something that works—not perfectly, but well enough to calm the chaos and get things done. But first, let me explain how many systems failed me before I arrived here.

The Cult of Getting Things Done

In the early 2010s, Getting Things Done by David Allen was gospel among knowledge workers. The book had that rare ability to sound both technical and therapeutic. Its premise was deceptively simple: capture everything, clarify next actions, and keep an empty mind by offloading responsibilities into a trusted system.

I loved the philosophy. I bought the file folders. I even watched Allen’s seminars on YouTube like they were TED Talks.

But in practice, GTD required a level of maintenance I couldn’t sustain. Weekly reviews? I’d do two, then miss the third, and by the fourth week I was buried in a mountain of “inboxes”—digital and physical. The system was like a garden: beautiful when tended, but ruthless when neglected.

According to a 2023 survey by RescueTime, only 12% of people who implement a productivity system stick with it for more than three months. Most abandon the system because it either becomes a burden or fails to adapt to real life.

“Systems like GTD are great in theory,” says Dr. Emily Novak, an organizational psychologist at Columbia University. “But they were designed for a pre-smartphone era. Our attentional environment has changed. And most people don’t have the mental bandwidth to be both the worker and the project manager of their own lives.”

The Allure of the App

As GTD began to fade, I turned to software. There’s something intoxicating about productivity apps. They’re shiny, frictionless, and full of potential.

I tried Todoist, Things, Asana, Notion, Trello, and Obsidian. Each one began with the same ritual: importing tasks, tagging them, creating projects. For a few days, I’d feel like I had my life together. Then the novelty would wear off, and my real habits—procrastination, over-planning, and avoidance—would creep back in.

In 2024 alone, more than 3,000 productivity apps were launched on the iOS App Store, according to AppFigures. But retention rates remain low. “It’s not about the tool,” says Novak. “It’s about the user’s relationship with time, attention, and self-worth.”

No app, I found, could overcome the friction of getting started—especially on bad days. I needed something more tactile, less dependent on dopamine loops and push notifications.

Analog Nostalgia: The Bullet Journal Experiment

Enter the Bullet Journal, created by designer Ryder Carroll. Equal parts planner, journal, and mindfulness tool, it felt like a rebellion against the digital noise.

I bought a dotted Leuchtturm1917 notebook. I learned the symbols: tasks (•), events (○), notes (–). I indexed pages, created a future log, and even tracked habits.

For a while, it worked. There was something soothing about writing by hand, flipping through pages, and seeing time pass in ink.

But soon, the journal became too precious. I was spending more time designing monthly spreads than actually completing tasks. I was documenting productivity instead of practicing it.

This, I later learned, is a common pitfall. “A lot of analog systems appeal to people’s aesthetic sense,” says Claire Zarecki, founder of Analog Mind, a consultancy for digital detoxing. “But perfectionism is the enemy of momentum.”

The Productivity-Content Pipeline

Somewhere along the way, I became aware of another force shaping my journey: the productivity-industrial complex. On YouTube, creators with stunning desks and soft lighting explained how they used apps like Notion to organize every facet of their lives—fitness, finance, food. On TikTok, 15-second clips showed people “romanticizing their routine.”

I watched these videos obsessively, trying to reverse-engineer their calm. But the more I consumed, the more inadequate I felt.

The irony is almost too on-the-nose: the productivity industry has become its own form of procrastination. In 2024, the global market for productivity tools and courses surpassed $12 billion, according to McKinsey. But usage doesn’t equal effectiveness.

“People confuse motion with progress,” says Novak. “They spend hours optimizing their system instead of working. It’s a form of anxiety management.”

It was during this phase—somewhere between watching my tenth Notion setup video and abandoning my third color-coded calendar—that I finally snapped.

The System That Finally Worked

What I use now doesn’t have a name. It’s not an app, or a method I could sell in a course. It’s more of a rhythm.

Every night, I write down three tasks I want to complete the next day. That’s it. I use a small, unbranded notebook I keep by my bed. The tasks aren’t always urgent, but they are always important.

The rule is: if I complete the three tasks, the day is a success—even if everything else goes sideways.

The system forces clarity. I can’t write down vague aspirations like “work on article.” I have to be specific: “Write the first 500 words of the productivity piece.” That specificity lowers the barrier to starting.

I also keep a separate “backlog” of long-term goals and ideas, which I review weekly. But I don’t look at it daily. That’s part of the magic. I’ve reduced the cognitive load of choosing what to do.

I still use a digital calendar for meetings, and Google Docs for collaboration. But for my personal priorities, pen and paper have proven unbeatable.

The result? I get more done—not in volume, but in meaning. I no longer feel like I’m spinning plates for the sake of movement.

Why It Works

What I’ve stumbled upon is not revolutionary. It borrows from a method called “The Rule of Three,” popularized by J.D. Meier at Microsoft. It’s also adjacent to ideas from Cal Newport, author of Deep Work, who advocates for a slow, focused approach to knowledge labor.

But the deeper reason this works, I believe, is because it aligns with how motivation functions. In his seminal paper on self-determination theory, psychologist Edward Deci explains that humans are most motivated when three needs are met: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

This system gives me autonomy (I choose the tasks), a sense of competence (I complete them), and a loose kind of relatedness (I’m building trust with myself).

Data from a 2023 study by Stanford University supports this. Participants who set no more than three intentional daily goals showed a 27% increase in task completion rates compared to those using traditional to-do lists.

A Note on Failure

Even now, I miss days. I sometimes write down three tasks and ignore them. I still get seduced by new tools and try to fix what isn’t broken.

But I’m no longer chasing perfection. I’ve stopped believing that a system can solve my ambivalence about work, or cure my inner critic.

“I think people expect productivity to be a feeling,” says Zarecki. “They think they’ll know they’re productive because they’ll feel good. But most of the time, it’s just showing up and doing something—not everything.”

Final Thoughts

If you’re looking for a grand revelation, I can’t offer one. The truth is, most productivity advice is like diet advice: simple in theory, hard in practice, and often weaponized by those selling the solution.

What I’ve learned is this: the best system is the one you’ll actually use. And sometimes, using it badly is still better than not using it at all.

There’s power in modest ambitions. In deciding that today’s work is enough. In believing that forward motion—even slow, clumsy, deeply human motion—is worthwhile.

So tonight, I’ll open my little notebook. I’ll write down three things. And tomorrow, I’ll try again.

©